What Google’s Gemini Gets Wrong About Email—and What Comes Next

Michael Becker

Google’s new Gemini-powered email drafts have started rolling out inside Gmail, marking a significant shift in how legacy tools are trying to bolt artificial intelligence onto existing interfaces.

At a glance, the idea makes sense: instead of writing an email from scratch, you provide a short prompt, and Gemini generates a ready-made message.

But as Pete Kooman (YC partner and founder of Optimizely) recently pointed out in a detailed breakdown, the actual experience falls flat—because the design prioritizes generic output over contextual understanding, speed over precision, and safety over authenticity.

He gave a real-world example: a simple request to notify his boss that he’d be home with a sick child. The resulting email was grammatically perfect, sterile in tone, and totally unrecognizable from the way any normal person would write.

It felt less like assistance and more like impersonation.

Worse, the prompt itself was nearly as long as the draft it generated—undermining the entire value proposition of convenience.

This isn’t a critique of Gemini as a model. The technology is strong. The failure is in how it’s deployed—trapped inside an interface built for static communication rather than adaptive decision-making.

That’s a larger pattern across productivity software right now: powerful models delivered through outdated design frameworks that never evolved to handle intelligent systems.

What Smart Email Clients Should Actually Do

We’ve approached this very differently.

Instead of treating AI as a magic wand for producing sentences, we’ve treated it as a layer of cognition inside the inbox—something that helps you recognize patterns, anticipate next steps, and reduce mental overhead as you move through high-stakes communication.

We didn’t ask: How can we make the AI sound more like you?
We asked: How can your inbox learn what you actually do—and help you do more of it, with less friction, and better timing?

If you’ve been looking for how to write better emails without sounding like an AI intern, this is the upgrade path.

Dynamic Email Beats Draft-Only AI

For people who rely on email to drive pipeline, maintain momentum, and close revenue, the real bottleneck isn’t so much the “writing" but the invisible complexity of keeping track of where each conversation stands, what signals are surfacing, and how to follow up in a way that feels natural, timely, and effective.

That’s why Polymail was built to focus on action—not output.

We surface read receipts and open tracking, not as vanity metrics, but as behavioral signals you can act on. We trigger follow-ups based on actual engagement, not arbitrary delays. We track thread activity across entire conversations, so your deal progression isn’t lost across apps. And we integrate scheduling, note-taking, and contextual memory all from the same place the work happens.

If you’re evaluating the best AI email tool for real business use, you’re already in the right lane.

Why Gmail and Free Email Tools Fall Short

While legacy email providers focus on superficial AI features layered into interfaces built twenty years ago, we’re building infrastructure for a much more dynamic reality.

In our world, the inbox becomes a real-time operational command center—for people who live in high-context, high-volume communication environments.

This is the real divide:

Companies like Google continue to prioritize safety, scale, and the lowest common denominator experience—designing tools that work acceptably for billions of users, while failing to support the nuanced needs of professionals operating at the edge of performance.

This is where most free email tools for startups break down too: they’re built for volume, not velocity.

So if you’re actively searching for Gmail alternatives for professionals, the right solution probably doesn’t look like a stripped-down clone—it looks like an intelligence layer built into where your real decisions happen.

Who Polymail Is Actually Built For

Polymail isn’t trying to be a general-purpose inbox for the masses.

It’s built for founders writing cold outbound at midnight, for recruiters managing dozens of open threads across candidates, for marketers running campaigns that depend on reply signals and timing precision, and for sales teams whose success depends on velocity and follow-through.

If you’re one of those people looking for an AI email client for sales, this is what you’ve been waiting for.

In that world, the value doesn’t come from watching a sentence appear. It comes from collapsing steps, surfacing intent, and reinforcing the rhythm that keeps your deals and decisions moving forward.

Email as a System, Not a Channel

If you’re someone who depends on email as a system—not just a communication channel—this is the shift to watch.

at some point, it’s not about how well an AI can mimic your tone.
It’s about whether your tools help you think clearly, act precisely, and stay in rhythm when it counts.

That’s the bar now. Anything less just adds noise.

Curious how it actually feels? Try Polymail free for 7 days.
Start your trial →

Subscribe to Polymail Blog

Get our updates in your inbox.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.